The federal debate in Australia just took place between the Prime Minister John Howard and the opposition, Labour leader Kevin Rudd. Though my personal political opinion is more economically conservative, I try to be as receptive as possible to any and all domestic solutions. As an Australian visiting resident I have had the privilege of speaking to many Australian working class citizens who are discontent with the current government.
Australia now has a dominant role in Iraq, something that slipped under the media radar, likely because it’s involvement was delayed. John Howard supported his decision of joining the fight against terrorism in Iraq by pointing out that Al Qaeda has to be defeated by a western coalition to maintain world authority. Australia is at a serious threat level for terrorist attacks, like Canada, like England and like the United States of America. He raised a valid argument. As a leader he chose to better his relations with the U.S. at the cost of the citizens interest and (hopefully only ‘terrorist’) lives.
I noticed that both parties said things like “if I’m elected then…” and, “if the people make me Prime Minister next term…”. I find that in political debates a wind of confidence can go a long way. Had I been an adviser to either parties I would have suggested saying “When I’m elected…” and, “When people make me Prime Minister…”, that being said, if it is called out as being arrogant reply by saying “When I’m elected, should the people choose,…”. This would give the audience more confidence in you as a leader.
Also, I found that both parties weren’t speaking to their audience. This is a two faced coin in the sense that, political debates are boring, therefore the people who watch them are into technical jargon and don’t mind sitting through them. But because they are boring they are only reaching the audience who are interested in that type of (dare I say) crap. I didn’t even know what they were referring to by saying. I.R. policy. (It’s industrial relations). Make the people listen, don’t speak because people are listening.
Stripping credibility is important for political debates, though I personally think it has to be done at the right time. There is no use in an opposition constantly trying to knock a leader who has been in power for 11 years. He is in power for a reason. If your opponent says something that is false, take a strip out of their credibility, then move on to what you stand for. By wasting time trying to discredit your opponent you leave a lot to be desired on your end.
Kevin Rudd won the debate officially. I personally don’t think he’ll win the election.